<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engagement – the new CMS buzzword bus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Hi, a few thoughts about our industry, content management, social media and engaging over the web…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Swatling</title>
		<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/comment-page-1#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Swatling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasivecontent.com/?p=279#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;Engagement&quot; goes beyond social media.  One important aspect beyond content and social is applications.  When I go a web site, I want to be able to do everything I want to do with that company on that web site.  I don&#039;t want to have to find my way to another site in order to check my order and another part of the site if I am a business partner.  Engagement is to bring all of the ways that I interact into one, unified web experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;Engagement&#8221; goes beyond social media.  One important aspect beyond content and social is applications.  When I go a web site, I want to be able to do everything I want to do with that company on that web site.  I don&#8217;t want to have to find my way to another site in order to check my order and another part of the site if I am a business partner.  Engagement is to bring all of the ways that I interact into one, unified web experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/comment-page-1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasivecontent.com/?p=279#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Zahoor - absolutely agree, Engagement is a focus on people not web page hits. My point is that traditional web analytics is a start, I want to explore that point more in future posts as I didn&#039;t want to run on too long in this one - you are right, insight comes from a more holistic view of your audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Zahoor &#8211; absolutely agree, Engagement is a focus on people not web page hits. My point is that traditional web analytics is a start, I want to explore that point more in future posts as I didn&#8217;t want to run on too long in this one &#8211; you are right, insight comes from a more holistic view of your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zahoor Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahoor Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasivecontent.com/?p=279#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I think engagement is about moving beyond web content management to a point where CMS, CRM and Social media meets Analytics. Buyers are looking for an integrated platform to better know the how&#039;s and why&#039;s of their target audiences. Fortunately this means we have moved beyond the point where website page views is an important statistic!

Engagement also requires a shift from an organisations editorial and publishing model to one where everyone could be a contributor irrespective of the platform (e.g. twitter, facebook), this requires addressing different technical and cultural issues, it&#039;s dealing with the latter which is the most challenging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think engagement is about moving beyond web content management to a point where CMS, CRM and Social media meets Analytics. Buyers are looking for an integrated platform to better know the how&#8217;s and why&#8217;s of their target audiences. Fortunately this means we have moved beyond the point where website page views is an important statistic!</p>
<p>Engagement also requires a shift from an organisations editorial and publishing model to one where everyone could be a contributor irrespective of the platform (e.g. twitter, facebook), this requires addressing different technical and cultural issues, it&#8217;s dealing with the latter which is the most challenging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/comment-page-1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasivecontent.com/?p=279#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Hi &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1886&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jeremiah Fellows&lt;/a&gt; - Thanks for your comment. I agree, no-one should start a blog or any kind of website without having even the sketchiest set of objectives. There was a good article in the New York Times about dying blogs - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/fashion/07blogs.html?_r=1&amp;scp=4&amp;sq=blogs&amp;st=cse - which I think also speaks about peoples expectations and lack of realistic objectives for starting a blog.
Anyway, back to your point - I guess in a blog example, if your objective is be read - then yes - there is value in the silent majority. If your objective is to start a conversation and nobody else is joining in then converting that silent majority to engaged members of your community is your challenge. But just knowing you have a silent majority, having some sort of analysis in place is a good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <a href="#comment-1886" rel="nofollow">@Jeremiah Fellows</a> &#8211; Thanks for your comment. I agree, no-one should start a blog or any kind of website without having even the sketchiest set of objectives. There was a good article in the New York Times about dying blogs &#8211; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/fashion/07blogs.html?_r=1&#038;scp=4&#038;sq=blogs&#038;st=cse" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/fashion/07blogs.html?_r=1&#038;scp=4&#038;sq=blogs&#038;st=cse</a> &#8211; which I think also speaks about peoples expectations and lack of realistic objectives for starting a blog.<br />
Anyway, back to your point &#8211; I guess in a blog example, if your objective is be read &#8211; then yes &#8211; there is value in the silent majority. If your objective is to start a conversation and nobody else is joining in then converting that silent majority to engaged members of your community is your challenge. But just knowing you have a silent majority, having some sort of analysis in place is a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Fellows</title>
		<link>http://www.iantruscott.me/engagement-the-new-cms-buzzword-bus/comment-page-1#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Fellows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasivecontent.com/?p=279#comment-65</guid>
		<description>If you do not have correlation between the number of times a blog is read or the number of twitter followers and some type of conversion or strategic objective being met, does that silent majority have value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do not have correlation between the number of times a blog is read or the number of twitter followers and some type of conversion or strategic objective being met, does that silent majority have value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
